<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
		<rss version="2.0">
		  <channel>
				<title><![CDATA[Fashion Newspaper - Articles - ]]></title>
				<link>http://www.fashionnewspaper.com</link>
				<description />
				<language>en-us</language>
				<copyright><![CDATA[http://www.fashionnewspaper.com]]></copyright>
				<generator>N/A</generator>
				<webMaster>clothingindustry@yahoo.com</webMaster>
				<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:02:10 MDT</lastBuildDate>
			
				<ttl>20</ttl>

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Fighting for the Right to be Fashionable]]></title>
					  <link>http://www.fashionnewspaper.com/articles/203/1/Fighting-for-the-Right-to-be-Fashionable/Page1.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[Two conversations this weekend led me to the same conclusion &#8211; most clothing made for women over a size 14 is CRAP. Why do plus-size designers believe that anyone who wears their clothes are the size of a typical size 8, just stretched in every direction? Not all size 18 women are 6&#8217; tall with shoulders like a linebacker. Not every size 20 woman has size F breasts, and just because someone wears a larger size in jeans does not mean she also has a higher rise. The average size of an American woman&#8217;s dress may be growing, but that does not mean the height of an American woman is growing at the same speed. More often than not, that plus sized shopper has the same bone structure as her size 8 counterpart, just more curves and padding over those bones.<br/>]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Alison Gary)</author>
					  <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:55:09 MDT</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fashionnewspaper.com/articles/203/1/Fighting-for-the-Right-to-be-Fashionable/Page1.html</guid>
					</item>

				
				  </channel>
				</rss>
			